Harris County, TX — December 31, 2025, Abraham Fiol and another person were injure due to a car accident at approximately 11:15 p.m. along Farm to Market 1960.
According to authorities, 24-year-old Abraham Fiol was traveling in an eastbound Toyota Prius on F.M. 1960 at the Cypresswood Drive intersection when the accident took place.
Officials indicate that an eastbound Chevrolet Silverado occupied by a 43-year-old man who had allegedly been under the influence at the time failed to appropriately control its speed. A collision consequently occurred between the front-end of the pickup truck and the rear-end of the Prius.
Fiol reportedly sustained serious injuries over the course of the accident. The man from the pickup suffered minor injuries, as well, according to reports.
Authorities have recommended Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon charges against the driver of the pickup truck. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When I read about late-night crashes like this one, I often think about how predictable the timing can be—and how little attention is paid to what may have happened before anyone got on the road. The focus usually lands on the collision itself, but the law recognizes that impaired driving often has a lead-up that matters just as much.
If reports are accurate and impairment played a role here, it raises an important but frequently overlooked question: where did the driver get the alcohol that may have contributed to this situation? Texas law allows those affected to explore whether an alcohol provider continued serving someone who was obviously intoxicated. That doesn’t excuse a driver’s conduct. Instead, it acknowledges that preventing impaired driving sometimes depends on decisions made well before a vehicle is in motion.
In many cases, that part of the story never gets fully investigated. Authorities understandably concentrate on what happened at the scene, while what happened earlier in the evening can remain unclear. For the injured party, that gap can mean unanswered questions about whether this outcome might have been avoided altogether. Dram shop law exists to help uncover whether overservice played a role when impairment is suspected.
When I step back and look at incidents like this, I’m reminded that accountability isn’t limited to the person who caused the collision. It can also include the systems and decisions that allowed an impaired person to keep drinking. Seeing the full picture is often the only way these cases truly make sense.
Three takeaways to keep in mind:
- Texas dram shop law recognizes that alcohol providers may share responsibility when overservice contributes to a crash.
- A full investigation should examine where the alleged impaired driver was drinking, not just what happened on the roadway.
- Many people don’t realize the law provides tools to uncover broader accountability when serious injuries are involved.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us