Harris County, TX — July 4, 2024, Camile Lebanks and two others were injured due to a car accident just before 5:45 p.m. along Pierce Street.
According to authorities, four people—38-year-old Camile Lebanks, two 24-year-old woman, and a 25-year-old man—were traveling in a southbound Kia Optima on Fannin Street at the Pierce Street intersection when the accident took place.

The intersection is controlled by a traffic light. Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, an eastbound Toyota Tacoma pickup truck entered the intersection at an apparently unsafe time, failing to heed the signal given by the traffic light. A collision consequently occurred between the front-end of the pickup truck and the back-right quarter of the Optima. The impact caused the Optima to overturn, coming to a stop resting on its roof.
Lebanks and the two 25-year-old women from the Optima reportedly sustained serious injuries over the course of the accident; they were transported to local medical facilities by EMS in order to receive necessary treatment. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When a car is flipped upside down in a city intersection, the question isn’t just who ran the light—it’s how a crash like that was even possible in the first place. Because collisions severe enough to cause a rollover typically suggest more than just a mistimed entry into a junction. They raise questions about speed, spacing, and whether every involved party was where they were supposed to be.
Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?
In urban intersections where traffic lights control flow in all directions, investigators should have taken precise measurements of damage, reviewed signal timing logs, and interviewed all drivers and passengers—especially when multiple people were seriously hurt. The configuration of the vehicles at rest could reveal whether the Tacoma struck the Optima at an angle that would actually cause it to flip, or whether other contributing factors were at play. Too often, police reports only scratch the surface, especially if one party is immediately blamed for running a red light.
Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
While human error is frequently assumed, it’s worth asking whether the Toyota Tacoma’s brakes, acceleration system, or even traction control malfunctioned. If the driver pressed the brake and the truck didn’t respond—due to a mechanical or sensor failure—then what appears to be negligence could actually point to a preventable mechanical fault. The Kia’s structure is relevant too: were there any stability issues that made a rollover more likely than it should’ve been?
Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
This is where much of the truth lives. Modern vehicles log a snapshot of critical data in the seconds leading up to a collision: vehicle speed, braking, steering, even seatbelt use. In a case involving a potential red-light violation, that data can confirm who was moving, who stopped, and who accelerated through the intersection at the wrong time. Without it, there’s a risk of relying too heavily on assumptions—or incomplete witness memory.
When a crash results in multiple injuries and a vehicle flipped on its roof, it’s not just a traffic mistake—it’s a mechanical and human systems failure. And the answers won’t come from assumptions. They come from asking hard questions and doing the work to get the facts straight.
Takeaways:
- Rollovers in intersection crashes often point to excessive speed or poor vehicle dynamics.
- Investigators should confirm traffic signal timing and physical evidence from the scene.
- Retrieving vehicle data is essential to verify or challenge claims made by either driver.

call us
Email Us
Text us