San Antonio, TX — October 31, 2024, a pedestrian was injured in a car accident at about 9:35 p.m. in the 1400 block of Gillette Boulevard.
A preliminary accident report indicates a 2007 Jeep Liberty was headed east near Lytle Avenue when it hit a pedestrian who was crossing the street.
The pedestrian, a 48-year-old San Antonio man whose name had not been made public, suffered serious injuries in the crash, according to the report.
The driver of the Jeep, who was not injured, told police that he did not see the pedestrian in time to stop, the report states.
Authorities have not released any additional information about the Bexar County crash.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When I read about a crash like this, my first thought is that I hope the injured pedestrian receives not only the medical care he needs but also a full and accurate account of how the crash happened. A pedestrian hit while crossing the street at night is an all-too-common occurrence, and it’s often assumed to be unavoidable. But in my experience, these incidents deserve far more scrutiny than they typically receive. To fully understand what happened on Gillette Boulevard near Lytle Avenue, we need to ask three critical questions.
First, did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? In any pedestrian collision, the most important questions are where the pedestrian was crossing, whether they were visible and whether the driver had enough time and space to avoid the impact. Did investigators document whether the pedestrian was in a marked crosswalk? Was the area well-lit, and were there any visual obstructions? Did the driver have a clear line of sight, and what was the vehicle’s speed at the time of the crash? These are all crucial pieces of information, and unless they’re carefully gathered and analyzed, it’s impossible to know whether the collision was truly unavoidable.
Second, has anyone considered whether a vehicle defect may have played a role? The Jeep Liberty is a 2007 model: old enough that age-related mechanical issues might factor in. Were the headlights functioning and properly aligned? Did the brakes respond appropriately, or was there a delay or failure in stopping power? It’s easy to accept that a driver “didn’t see” someone, but it’s essential to determine whether the vehicle was equipped — and functioning — in a way that would have allowed the driver to see and respond to a pedestrian in time. These issues won’t show up in a crash scene photo; they require a detailed inspection of the vehicle.
Finally, has all the electronic data related to the crash been collected? While the Jeep may not have an advanced event data recorder, it may still contain engine control module data with basic information about vehicle speed, throttle position, and brake input before the collision. Additionally, surveillance footage from nearby businesses or traffic cameras may show the pedestrian’s movement or how the vehicle approached the area. If the pedestrian had a phone or wearable device, that might offer GPS or motion data helpful in reconstructing the crash timeline. This kind of evidence is often critical and must be preserved quickly before it’s lost.
Crashes like this deserve a complete investigation, not just a passing assumption that the pedestrian was hard to see. A man was seriously injured, and the only way to determine what happened — and whether it could have been avoided — is to ask the right questions, preserve the evidence and follow the facts wherever they lead. That’s how we ensure that everyone involved gets the clarity and accountability they deserve.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us