Hays County, TX — June 30, 2024, Carmelina Valerin-Gutierrez and a teen were injured in a rear-end car accident just after 5:30 p.m. on the I-35 frontage road.
According to authorities, three people—a 37-year-old man, 40-year-old Carmelina Valerin-Gutierrez, and a 19-year-old woman—were traveling in a southbound Nissan Altima on the I-35 service road at the Center Street intersection when the accident took place.
The Altima was in a line-up of cars that were at a stop for a red light. Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, a southbound Nissan Rogue failed to appropriately control its speed. It was consequently involved in a collision with several of the cars that had been at a stop at the intersection, including the Altima.
Both Valerin-Gutierrez and the 19-year-old woman who had been in the Altima suffered serious injuries over the course of the accident; they were transported to local medical facilities by EMS in order to receive necessary treatment. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
Crashes in traffic queues may seem cut-and-dried, but when serious injuries are involved, the simple version often misses important details. A rear-end impact doesn’t just raise questions about attention—it raises questions about equipment, timing, and whether something else made a bad situation worse.
1. Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?
Chain-reaction collisions demand more than a quick look at skid marks. Did investigators map out how many vehicles were hit and in what sequence? Was there a full accounting of how far apart the cars were before the crash? These details help determine not just what went wrong with the Rogue, but whether any vehicles ahead contributed to the severity by being too close or moving unpredictably. Without a full reconstruction, it’s hard to know whether the crash was entirely avoidable—or just badly compounded.
2. Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
When a driver fails to stop in time, it’s usually chalked up to distraction or misjudgment. But what if the brakes didn’t respond? If the Rogue had worn brake pads, ABS malfunction, or a software issue in its cruise control system, that could explain why it didn’t slow properly. The same goes for the Altima or other vehicles in line—if headrests or seats failed to protect the occupants, that could worsen injuries in what should’ve been a survivable impact. Inspections done early could have made a difference in identifying any of those issues.
3. Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Both the Rogue and the Altima likely recorded critical crash data, including speed, brake pressure, seatbelt usage, and crash severity. That information can reveal whether the Rogue driver tried to stop or never touched the brakes—and how much time they had to react. Data like this is especially important when multiple vehicles are involved, because it helps clarify how hard each one was hit, in what order, and at what speed.
Every rear-end crash has a cause—but that cause isn’t always as simple as a moment of inattention. Getting clear answers means asking what the vehicle did, not just what the driver saw.
Takeaways:
- A full investigation should detail vehicle positions, timing, and sequence in multi-car collisions.
- Brake or cruise control failures in the striking vehicle may explain failure to stop in time.
- Crash data systems can show braking attempts, impact forces, and seatbelt use.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us