South Houston, TX — December 6, 2025, Corey Moss and Angelique Moss were injured in a hit-and-run accident at about 9:40 p.m. on Galveston Road/State Highway 3.

A preliminary accident report indicates that a 2024 Ford F-250, driving without headlights, was heading east on Arizona when it collided with a southbound 2003 Suzuki GS1000 while making a left turn. The pickup did not immediately stop after the crash.

Motorcyclist Corey Moss, 50, and passenger Angelique Moss, 50, were seriously injured in the crash, according to the report.

The Ford driver, who was not hurt, was charged with failure to stop and render aid, the report states.

Authorities have not released any additional information about the Harris County crash at this time.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

When serious injuries happen in a hit-and-run, the aftermath isn’t just about physical recovery; it’s also about unanswered questions. In many cases, what’s most frustrating isn’t just the crash itself, but the uncertainty about whether every possible cause has been examined and every piece of evidence collected. That’s especially true when motorcycles are involved, where visibility and reaction time can turn into life-altering variables.

Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? Given that charges were brought for failure to stop and render aid, it’s clear law enforcement made some effort to identify the pickup’s driver. But beyond that, it’s worth asking whether the investigation dug deeper than the surface. Was the crash reconstructed with any precision: did anyone map the intersection, estimate vehicle speeds or analyze the timing of the turn? When motorcycles are struck during turns, it’s often critical to understand whether the motorist had sufficient time to see and react, especially if the truck was reportedly driving without headlights. That detail alone should have triggered more advanced scene analysis, but that’s not something most standard crash reports reveal.

Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash? A Ford F-250 driving without headlights opens the door to more questions than answers. Was this a deliberate act, or could a lighting malfunction have been involved? Modern trucks rely on a host of electrical components; if there was a problem with the lighting system, that should have been caught through a mechanical inspection. And given that this involved a left turn across another vehicle’s path, there’s also a case for checking whether steering or braking issues played a role. It’s not enough to assume operator error when mechanical failure could just as easily create a dangerous situation.

Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected? Electronic records could make a huge difference here. The pickup may have stored data about speed, braking and even whether the headlights were activated. If those systems were functional, the engine control module would likely reflect it. Also, dash cameras, whether in the truck or nearby vehicles, could show the truck’s visibility or lack thereof. And on the motorcycle side, GPS or mobile phone records might offer clues about speed or direction of travel. These bits of data can help reconstruct what really happened in a way eyewitness statements alone often can’t.

When a hit-and-run driver is caught, the story shouldn't end with an arrest. There’s still the matter of understanding how and why the crash occurred in the first place. Every injury deserves a full accounting; not just of who was involved, but of whether the systems and machines in play did what they were supposed to do.

Key Takeaways:

• Police should verify whether the crash scene was professionally reconstructed.
• A mechanical inspection of the truck could reveal overlooked malfunctions.
• Data from vehicle systems might clarify visibility and reaction times.