Lufkin, TX — July 5, 2024, Cory Haggard and Valerie Haggard were injured in a car accident at about 9:50 a.m. in the 2000 block of West Frank Avenue.
A preliminary accident report indicates that a 1997 Chevrolet Silverado C2500 was heading south on State Highway Loop 287/North John Redditt Drive when it allegedly ran a red light at Frank Avenue and crashed into a westbound 2023 Nissan Frontier.
Nissan driver Cory Haggard, 45, and passenger Valerie Haggard, 40, were seriously injured in the crash, according to the report, while two teens with them were not hurt.
The Chevrolet driver, who was not injured, was cited for running a red light, the report states.
The report does not include any additional information about the Angelina County crash.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When serious crashes unfold in broad daylight, they often raise more questions than answers. It’s easy to assume everything has been accounted for when citations are issued at the scene, but the real story behind what caused a collision, and who bears responsibility, can take much longer to uncover. Especially in cases involving significant injuries, a closer look is not just helpful, it’s necessary.
Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? While the citation for running a red light suggests someone was paying attention, a ticket doesn’t always tell the full story. Did investigators collect traffic light timing data? Was the scene laser-mapped or reconstructed to confirm how both vehicles moved leading up to impact? These are critical steps that go far beyond simply taking witness statements or making assumptions based on damage. Without a robust scene analysis, important details about vehicle speed, positioning, and driver behavior may go unexamined. It’s also worth considering how much crash reconstruction training the responding officers had. Experience levels can vary widely between jurisdictions.
Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash? When a driver runs a red light, it’s often chalked up to error or distraction, but it’s worth asking: could something in the vehicle have failed? Older vehicles, like a 1997 truck, are more vulnerable to brake problems or electrical issues that could prevent proper stopping. A stuck accelerator or faulty brake light might go unnoticed unless someone physically inspects the vehicle’s systems. Without a mechanical evaluation, it’s impossible to rule out whether a defect played a role, even if the driver was cited.
Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected? In 2023, most vehicles are rolling data centers. The Nissan likely contained systems that recorded speed, braking and seatbelt usage. That information could confirm how the driver reacted in the moments before impact. Traffic cameras and nearby surveillance systems might also provide valuable footage to clarify how events unfolded. Even if citations were issued quickly, it’s important to preserve all electronic data before it’s lost or overwritten, especially when serious injuries are involved.
Crashes like this one can appear straightforward, but the deeper questions still matter. Not every mistake is just human error, and not every crash is fully understood with a citation. Taking time to probe beneath the surface is what ensures fairness and accountability.
Key Takeaways:
- Tickets at the scene don’t always reflect a complete investigation.
- Older vehicles may have mechanical issues that go unnoticed without inspection.
- Vehicle data and traffic camera footage can reveal what really happened before a crash.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us