Brazos County, TX — February 1, 2025, Guillermo Dimas Becerra was injured in a single-car accident shortly before 10:15 p.m. along Smetana Road.

According to authorities, 38-year-old Guillermo Dimas Becerra was traveling in a southeast bound GMC Sierra pickup truck on Smetana Road in the vicinity northwest of the S.H. 21 intersection when the accident took place.

The cause of the accident remains unclear. Officials indicate that, for reasons yet to be confirmed, the pickup truck attempted a turn at an apparently unsafe time. A single-vehicle collision followed in which it reportedly ran into a fence.

Becerra suffered serious injuries over the course of the accident, according to reports. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

When I read about a crash like the one that left Guillermo Dimas Becerra seriously injured, I know that many people will assume it was simply a case of misjudging a turn. While that’s certainly a possibility, my experience has shown me that single-vehicle crashes—especially those involving unexpected loss of control—are often more complex than they first appear. Instead of making assumptions, it’s important to ask the right questions to ensure that all possible contributing factors are explored. To that end, there are three critical questions that need to be considered.

First, did the authorities conduct a thorough investigation? When a vehicle leaves the roadway and crashes, investigators should determine whether external factors played a role. Did law enforcement examine the roadway for hazards such as debris, uneven pavement, or poor lighting? Did they collect statements from any available witnesses? Were there indications that another vehicle’s actions contributed to the crash but left the scene? The quality of the investigation will determine whether all possible explanations are explored or if key details are overlooked.

Second, has anyone looked into whether a vehicle defect contributed to the crash? A sudden inability to navigate a turn can sometimes be linked to mechanical failures rather than driver error. Problems with braking, steering, or electronic stability control could prevent a driver from maintaining control. Additionally, modern vehicles often include lane-keeping assistance and collision avoidance systems—if those systems failed to function properly, that would be important to investigate. Unfortunately, these factors are rarely examined unless someone specifically requests a forensic vehicle inspection. If the vehicle is quickly repaired or scrapped, any evidence of a defect may be lost before it can be analyzed.

Lastly, have investigators gathered all available electronic data? Most modern vehicles are equipped with event data recorders (EDRs), which capture crucial details such as speed, braking, and steering inputs in the moments leading up to a crash. This data could help clarify whether the driver attempted to correct the vehicle’s path or if the vehicle responded unpredictably. Additionally, if any nearby businesses or traffic cameras recorded the crash, that footage could provide valuable context. If this evidence isn’t secured quickly, it may become unavailable, making it harder to determine the full circumstances of the accident.

At the end of the day, answering these questions could be essential to understanding what really happened and why. A thorough examination of all three of these issues—including the quality of police investigations, possible vehicle defects, and electronic data—is the least that can be done to ensure that those affected by the crash receive the clarity they deserve.