Beaumont, TX — September 25, 2024, one person was injured in a hit-and-run accident at about 9:50 p.m. on U.S. Highway 90/College Street.
A preliminary accident report indicates a 2013 Toyota Sienna was headed east near Avenue E when it hit a pedestrian. The SUV did not stop after the collision.
The pedestrian, a 66-year-old Beaumont man whose name has not been made public, suffered serious injuries in the crash, according to authorities.
Police were able to track down the driver of the Toyota, who has been charged with failing to stop and render aid after an accident, the report states.
Authorities have not released any additional information about the Jefferson County crash.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When I see a report like the one from Beaumont, where a pedestrian was seriously injured in a hit-and-run crash and the driver was later located and charged, I think about how important it is that the investigation continues even after an arrest is made. While locating the driver is a critical step, understanding exactly what happened — and why — requires more than a criminal charge. It requires a full, evidence-based examination of the incident. That’s why we must still ask three essential questions: Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash? Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Starting with the investigation, the fact that the driver left the scene doesn’t mean we can stop asking how and why the collision occurred in the first place. The crash happened at night, around 9:50 p.m. on U.S. Highway 90 near Avenue E, which raises immediate questions about lighting, crosswalk availability, traffic conditions and whether the pedestrian was in or near the roadway. Were there witnesses? Did nearby businesses or traffic cameras capture the impact? Was the pedestrian visible under the conditions, and did the driver have a reasonable opportunity to see and react? A complete reconstruction of the crash scene is essential to understanding these elements. That’s especially true in hit-and-run cases, where the initial absence of the driver may limit what can be learned without revisiting the scene thoroughly.
The next point, vehicle defects, is particularly important in determining whether the Toyota Sienna may have contributed to the crash in ways not immediately obvious. For example, did the headlights function properly at the time of the crash? Were the brakes in good working condition? If a system failure affected the driver’s ability to see the pedestrian or avoid the impact, that’s relevant not just for accountability but also for understanding how the crash happened. This is especially important in older vehicles like a 2013 Sienna, which may be more susceptible to wear-related issues. But identifying those problems requires that the vehicle be preserved and examined, something that doesn’t always happen once the criminal aspect of a case becomes the focus.
Lastly, we must ask whether electronic data has been preserved and reviewed. A 2013 Sienna is likely equipped with an engine control module that can store valuable pre-crash data, such as speed, throttle position and braking behavior. That data could confirm or refute key details, such as whether the driver attempted to stop or how fast the vehicle was traveling at the time of impact. Phone data may also help determine whether distraction played a role. These sources of information are essential to building a complete picture of the crash and ensuring that nothing is missed in the rush to resolve the case.
At the end of the day, identifying the driver and filing charges is only part of the process. For the injured pedestrian and his family, accountability means more than prosecution: it means understanding the full truth of what happened. That truth can only come from asking the right questions and making sure the evidence is handled with the same urgency and care that the people affected by this crash deserve.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us