Greenburgh, NY — December 15, 2025, James Aggrey was injured in a truck accident at about 8:50 p.m. on the New York State Thruway.
Authorities said a 2020 Volvo semi-truck collided with a 2006 Audi A near exit 7A.
Audi driver James Aggrey, 66, of Ossining suffered life-threatening injuries in the crash, according to authorities.
The truck driver was hospitalized with non-life-threatening injuries, authorities said.
Authorities have not released any additional information about the Westchester County crash at this time.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When a serious collision happens between a passenger vehicle and an 18-wheeler, most people want to know the same thing: How did a crash like this even occur on a highway where traffic is typically flowing in the same direction? At this point, we know that a semi-truck and a car collided near Exit 7A on the New York State Thruway, and that the car’s driver suffered life-threatening injuries. But beyond that, critical questions remain unanswered.
For example, what were the positions and movements of both vehicles leading up to the crash? Was one vehicle merging, stopped or changing lanes? That may sound like detail work, but small facts like these often hold the key to who is responsible.
When a truck and a car collide, people naturally assume the truck driver is at fault; and in some cases, they’re right. But experience tells me that it’s dangerous to jump to conclusions without hard evidence. That’s why a proper investigation must begin by collecting the right kind of data. Was the truck equipped with an engine control module (ECM)? That device logs vehicle speed, braking, throttle input and other vital information in the moments before a crash. Did the truck have front- or driver-facing cameras? What about the driver’s cell phone records. Was he distracted or in communication with dispatch at the time?
Depending on whether the truck was changing lanes, merging from a ramp or simply failed to maintain its lane, different legal theories might apply. Without dashcam footage or eyewitness accounts, authorities may have a hard time piecing this together on their own. That’s where an independent investigation — one that includes ECM downloads, physical inspections and a full review of the driver’s logs and employment history — becomes essential.
In my own practice, I’ve handled cases where the root cause wasn’t just driver error but poor training, lax oversight or careless hiring practices. One driver I encountered had been fired multiple times from previous jobs, but was still put behind the wheel by a company that didn’t bother to conduct a meaningful background check. By the time we got involved, the damage was already done, but the evidence made clear that it wasn’t just the driver who failed. The company had plenty of chances to prevent the crash but looked the other way.
Until investigators examine what really happened in this Westchester County crash — including what the truck was doing at the time and whether company oversight played a role — there’s no way to know who should be held accountable. But that’s exactly why a thorough, evidence-based investigation matters.
Key Takeaways:
- Authorities haven’t said what led to the collision, leaving critical facts about the vehicles’ movements unknown.
- Electronic data from the truck, dashcam footage and driver phone records could all help explain how the crash occurred.
- Determining fault requires more than guessing. It takes a thorough investigation into both driver behavior and trucking company policies.
- In similar cases I’ve handled, company negligence during hiring or training turned out to be just as important as what the driver did behind the wheel.
- Accountability starts with evidence. Until we know what that evidence shows, no one can say for sure who’s responsible.
call us 
Email Us 
Text us