Atlanta, TX — June 23, 2025, Bonnie Lavine was injured in a hit-and-run accident at about 9:30 p.m. on Pinecrest Road/State Highway 77.

A preliminary accident report indicates that an unknown vehicle was heading east when it allegedly ran a stop sign and crashed into a 2014 Toyota Camry that was going south on Louise Street/State Highway 43.

Toyota driver Bonnie Lavine, 59, was seriously injured in the crash, according to the report.

Authorities have not released any additional information about the Cass County crash at this time.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

After a violent crash, it’s natural to focus on the chaos and aftermath. But for those trying to understand what really happened, and why, what matters most is what gets looked at in the hours and days that follow. That deeper dive is often the only way to ensure real accountability.

Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? In hit-and-run cases, especially those involving serious injuries, the quality of the investigation makes all the difference. It’s not enough to simply note that a stop sign was ignored. Investigators should have documented the scene in detail: laser-mapped the impact zone, marked debris patterns and worked to reconstruct each vehicle’s path before the crash. With one driver gone from the scene, it becomes even more important to chase down surveillance footage from nearby businesses or homes and identify possible witnesses who saw the moments leading up to impact. When time and effort are in short supply, it’s easy to miss those pieces.

Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash? Even in a hit-and-run, the vehicle left behind deserves a closer look. Could the driver’s car have had a defect that limited braking response or steering control? With older vehicles especially, worn or failing parts can quietly set the stage for disaster. A full mechanical inspection might uncover something subtle: brake fade, a stuck pedal or even a malfunctioning airbag that failed to protect the driver fully. Those checks can be critical in explaining not just the crash itself, but why the injuries were so severe.

Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected? There’s also the question of data: what the car’s onboard systems recorded, what nearby traffic cameras might show or even whether phones pinged local towers around the time of the crash. For the driver left at the scene, the Toyota’s own engine control module could shed light on last-second braking, speed or sudden maneuvers. That kind of evidence can either back up a driver’s account, or contradict it. In hit-and-run cases, technology often fills in gaps that the missing driver leaves behind.

When someone gets seriously hurt and the other driver disappears, what’s left is a trail of questions. But answers don’t just appear. They have to be pursued, piece by piece. And that only happens when every angle gets the attention it deserves.

Key Takeaways:

• A thorough investigation should go beyond witness statements and include mapping, video review and vehicle path reconstruction.
• The vehicle left at the scene should be inspected for mechanical issues that may have contributed to the crash or injury severity.
• Digital data from the vehicle and surroundings can offer critical insight into what happened before and during the crash.