Harris County, TX — July 19, 2025, two people were injured due to a car accident at approximately 11:00 p.m. along the Gulf Freeway (I-45).

According to authorities, two people—a 68-year-old woman and an 83-year-old woman—were traveling in a southbound Hyundai Accent on I-45 in the vicinity of Emancipation Avenue, southeast of I-69, when the accident took place.

Officials indicate that, for reasons yet unknown reasons, a southbound Subaru Outback attempted a lane change at an apparently unsafe time. A collision consequently occurred between the Outback and the Accent.

The 83-year-old woman reportedly sustained serious injuries over the course of the accident. The 68-year-old woman suffered minor injuries, as well, according to reports. It does not appear that anyone else was hurt.

Additional details pertaining to this incident—including the identities of the victims—are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

When a serious injury results from what’s described as a poorly timed lane change, the cause is often chalked up to a moment of carelessness. But these kinds of collisions—especially involving older occupants—deserve a closer look. There’s a difference between a bad driving decision and a system that failed to help avoid it.

Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?
Any crash on a high-speed roadway like I-45 should involve more than just exchanging insurance details. Was the scene mapped to determine lane positions and relative speeds? Did investigators gather information about whether either driver had time—or space—to react? A poorly executed lane change often gives the appearance of driver error, but the timing, angle of impact, and any evasive action tell a more complete story. If those elements weren’t documented, the investigation may already be missing key facts.

Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
In modern vehicles like a Subaru Outback, driver-assist systems are designed to help avoid collisions. Lane-change assist, blind-spot warnings, and emergency braking should act as a safety net. If the Outback drifted into the Accent despite those systems, it’s worth asking: were they working? Were the sensors obstructed or malfunctioning? Likewise, if the Hyundai Accent failed to warn its driver or prepare for a collision, that’s also relevant. These systems can fail silently—and unless someone checks, those failures go unnoticed.

Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Both vehicles likely contain event data that can confirm what the drivers were doing in the seconds before the crash—speed, steering, braking, and throttle input. That data can show whether the Outback swerved unexpectedly or if the Accent reacted. It can also confirm whether any safety systems triggered—or didn’t. In high-speed situations, that kind of timing can be the difference between a close call and a serious injury. But this information needs to be pulled early before it’s lost or overwritten.

A serious injury from what might look like a minor merge isn’t just an unfortunate outcome—it’s a sign that more may have gone wrong than meets the eye. It’s worth asking whether the drivers had the tools they needed to avoid it—and if those tools worked at all.

Takeaways:

• Highway lane-change collisions require full reconstruction of vehicle movement, timing, and space between cars.
• Safety systems like blind-spot monitors or lane-keeping assist may fail and must be inspected.
• Vehicle data can confirm whether either driver tried to react—or if the vehicles didn’t respond.