Liberty County, TX — September 19, 2025, Jose Gallegos was killed and Keyla Gayton was injured in a pedestrian versus car accident shortly before 10:30 p.m. on S.H. 146.

According to authorities, 25-year-old Keyla Gayton was traveling in a southbound Toyota Corolla on S.H. 146 in the vicinity south of U.S. Highway 90 when the accident took place.

Officials indicate that, for reasons yet to be confirmed, the Corolla struck 46-year-old Jose Alfredo Gallegos, a man who had been on foot in the area at the time. Following the initial collision, the Corolla apparently overturned.

Gallegos reportedly sustained fatal injuries due to the accident and was declared deceased at the scene. Gayton suffered serious injuries, as well, reports state, and was transported to an area medical facility by EMS in order to receive necessary treatment. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

When a crash claims a pedestrian’s life and also injures the driver, the first reports often leave out the most important question—how did things unfold in those critical moments before impact? Both the human loss and the overturned vehicle suggest there may be more to the story than what’s visible on the surface.

1. Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?

A case like this demands a careful reconstruction of events. Did investigators establish exactly where the pedestrian was in relation to the southbound Toyota Corolla? Was the car’s speed measured, and was there evidence of braking or swerving? The fact that the vehicle overturned afterward could indicate sudden maneuvers or instability that need to be documented. Without that level of analysis, the chain of events leading up to the tragedy remains incomplete.

2. Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?

When a collision leads to both a pedestrian fatality and a vehicle rollover, mechanical issues must be considered. A brake malfunction, steering failure, or even a suspension problem could have played a role in both the impact and the overturn. Newer vehicles may also carry pedestrian-detection and automatic braking systems—if the Corolla was equipped with such features, investigators should determine whether they worked as intended. If the vehicle isn’t inspected carefully, the role of a defect could be overlooked entirely.

3. Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?

The Corolla likely contains an event data recorder that can show speed, steering angle, braking activity, and safety system engagement before the crash. That information could clarify whether the driver reacted to the pedestrian and what led to the overturn. Phones, GPS systems, and nearby cameras may provide additional evidence of the moments before impact. Without securing that electronic trail early, key details about the sequence of events may already be lost.

A crash this severe doesn’t begin and end with what’s visible at the scene. The real answers—about why a pedestrian was struck and why the car overturned—depend on whether investigators dig into every layer of evidence before it disappears.

Takeaways:

• A full reconstruction is needed to clarify both the pedestrian impact and the rollover.
• Vehicle malfunctions or failed safety systems could have contributed.
• Electronic data and nearby cameras may provide the clearest account of what happened.