Kenesha Silmon Killed in Car Accident in Lancaster, TX
Dallas County, TX — June 1, 2025, Kenesha Silmon was killed as the result of a car accident at around 10:05 p.m. along Interstate 35E.
According to initial details about the accident, it happened along northbound lanes of the interstate near Shasta Drive.
Investigators said that 44-year-old Kenesha Silmon was in a Chevy Impala traveling northbound along the interstate. A Lexus was also going northbound. Somehow, the vehicles crossed paths and collided. Kenesha Silmon reportedly died due to the accident.
While factors surrounding the crash are unclear, auhtorities say they recommended the Lexus driver be charged for accident involving death. No further information is available.
Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman
When a crash results in a fatality and a driver is quickly charged, it can feel like the case is closed. But those automatic conclusions often miss important details that could be significant for the victims and families. Here are three areas that should never be overlooked:
1. Did authorities allocate enough resources and expertise for a full investigation?
At face value, lane-crossing collisions may seem obvious. But unless crash reconstruction experts, mapping tools, and sufficient time are used, subtle but critical factors—like visibility issues, evasive maneuvers, or pre-crash decisions—can go unrecorded. Without proper attention, what seems “open-and-shut” may be anything but.
2. Were mechanical failures or safety system issues ruled out?
Even when one driver is suspected of wrongdoing, hidden vehicle malfunctions—brake or steering failures, tire blowouts, or electronic stability problems—can force vehicles to cross lanes unexpectedly. It’s also vital to check if seatbelts and airbags performed as designed, because a failure here can affect outcome as much as the crash itself.
3. Was digital and video evidence collected to back up conclusions?
Vehicle data (if available), dashcams, toll-road cameras, or nearby surveillance footage can provide a neutral view of what actually happened. These tools often tell a more reliable version of events than memory or hurried statements.
These questions can help ensure that more than just surface-level details get attention after a crash. Doing so can be a significant step forward for victims and families who deserve know all factors leading to the crash are going to be addressed appropriately.
Key Takeaways:
- Treating a crash like it's already solved risks ignoring overlooked—yet essential—evidence.
- Vehicle defects and safety system failures can dramatically change the understanding of what happened.
- Digital logs and camera footage are often the clearest witnesses, and should always be pursued.
*We appreciate your feedback and welcome anyone to comment on our blog entries, however all visitor blog comments must be approved by the site moderator prior to showing live on the site. By submitting a blog comment you acknowledge that your post may appear live on the site for any visitors to see, pending moderator approval. The operators of this site are not responsible for the accuracy or content of the comments made by site visitors. By submitting a comment, blog post, or email to this site you acknowledge that you may receive a response with regard to your questions or concerns. If you contact Grossman Law Offices using this online form, your message will not create an attorney-client relationship and will not necessarily be treated as privileged or confidential! You should not send sensitive or confidential information via the Internet. Since the Internet is not necessarily a secure environment, it is not possible to ensure that your message sent via the Internet might be kept secure and confidential. When you fill out a contact or comment form, send us an email directly, initiate a chat session or call us, you acknowledge we may use your contact information to communicate with you in the future for marketing purposes, but such marketing will always be done in an ethical way.