Tarrant County, TX — May 6, 2025, Michon Starks was killed following a pedestrian versus car accident shortly before 9:00 p.m. along Wichita Street.

According to authorities, 38-year-old Michon Starks was on foot on Wichita Street in the vicinity just north of the Alcannon Avenue intersection when the accident took place.

Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, Starks was struck by a northbound Chevrolet Silverado. Starks reportedly suffered fatal injuries as a result of the collision. Additional information pertaining to this incident is not currently available. The investigation is currently ongoing.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

Those affected by a crash like this almost always find themselves looking for answers. People naturally want to know how something so serious could happen—and more importantly, whether it could have been prevented. But while some questions are asked right away, others that matter just as much tend to get overlooked. From my experience, understanding what really happened means digging deeper than the surface details.

First, did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? This is the starting point for any real understanding. When a pedestrian is hit and killed, especially at night, it's common for investigators to assume the person simply walked into traffic. But assumptions don’t replace evidence. A thorough investigation should involve mapping out the exact spot of the collision, talking to witnesses, and collecting surveillance footage from nearby homes or businesses. Was the lighting in the area adequate? Were there any obstacles that made it hard for the driver or the pedestrian to see each other? It’s critical to find out whether the scene was carefully examined or if the investigation just focused on the most obvious explanation.

Next, has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash? This isn’t something most people think to ask, but it matters. If the Silverado had a headlight issue, brake failure, or malfunctioning steering, that could have made it harder for the driver to react in time. In some cases, drivers do everything they’re supposed to, but their vehicle doesn’t respond the way it should. Even a small defect can turn a close call into a fatal incident. Unfortunately, defect checks often get skipped if there's no immediate sign of a mechanical problem at the scene, but that’s not the same as ruling them out.

Finally, has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected? Modern trucks like a Silverado often have onboard systems that record valuable information—speed, braking, steering input, and even headlights activation. This data can show whether the driver slowed down or swerved, or whether they were going faster than they should have been. It can also confirm whether the vehicle’s safety systems were working. Too often, this kind of data is never pulled because the car isn’t visibly damaged or because investigators don’t think it's worth the effort. But in a fatal crash, no detail is too small.

When it comes to crashes like this one, it's not enough to rely on quick conclusions. Getting to the truth takes asking the right questions—and making sure they get answered. Only then can those affected begin to understand what really happened and why.

Takeaways:

• A complete crash investigation must go beyond first impressions and include a detailed review of the scene.
• Mechanical failures and vehicle defects should always be considered, even if nothing looks wrong on the surface.
• Collecting and reviewing electronic data from the vehicle is essential for understanding the driver’s actions and the car’s behavior.