San Antonio, TX — June 15, 2025, a man sustained injuries as the result of a multi-car accident that happened around 3:33 a.m. along Interstate 10.

According to initial details about the accident, it took place at the intersection of the I-10 service road and Wurzbach Road.

Investigators said that a 21-year-old man was in a Kia Forte going southwest along Wurzbach at the time. While crossing the I-10 service road, authorities say that a distracted Honda Civic driver crashed into the Kia. A Honda Accord on Wurzbach was also struck.

Due to the accident, the Kia driver reportedly had serious injuries. No other injuries were confirmed. Potential charges were unconfirmed, as well.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

When a crash involves multiple vehicles and a claim of distraction, it can be tempting to treat it as an open-and-shut situation. But especially when someone ends up seriously hurt, it’s important to ask whether the full picture was ever established—and whether assumptions were allowed to take the place of answers.

1. Did the authorities have the time, equipment, and training to fully investigate the crash?
Three-vehicle collisions at busy intersections are rarely simple. Confirming the order of impacts, each vehicle’s movement, and whether drivers had time to react takes more than just basic notes. It requires crash reconstruction tools and trained investigators who know how to use them. If that level of detail wasn’t part of the response, important questions could still be unanswered.

2. Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
If the Civic driver didn’t react in time, distraction is one possible explanation—but not the only one. Brake failure, a stuck accelerator, or a problem with a driver-assist system could all lead to the same result. Unless the vehicle was inspected, there’s no way to know if a mechanical issue played a role.

3. Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Vehicle data—like speed, braking input, and steering response—can confirm whether a driver tried to avoid the crash or never reacted. GPS and phone activity might support or challenge the claim of distraction. But this kind of evidence is only useful if it was secured early, before it could be lost.

At the end of the day, victims and families that have more evidence telling their story are going to generally have better outcomes than those who just rely on preliminary police investigations. That's why asking key questions early on can make a big difference.

Takeaways:

• Serious crashes involving multiple vehicles deserve more than surface-level review.
• Mechanical failure could mimic distraction but won’t be discovered without inspection.
• Onboard and digital data may confirm what really happened—if anyone retrieved it in time.