Austin County, TX — July 31, 2024, Nancy Lozano was killed due to a car accident at approximately 7:30 a.m. along State Highway 159.

According to authorities, 58-year-old Nancy Lozano was traveling in a westbound BMW sedan on S.H. 159 approaching the Witte Road intersection when the accident took place.

Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, an eastbound Ford F-150 pickup truck failed to appropriately control its speed. It apparently veered to the right and into the shoulder of the highway in order to avoid a collision with a car that had come to a stop as it waited for oncoming traffic to clear so it could make a left turn onto Witte. As the pickup returned to the roadway from the shoulder, it apparently failed to maintain control, crossing over the center line and entering the westbound lane. There, a collision occurred between the front-left of the pickup truck and the front-left side of the BMW.

Lozano reportedly sustained fatal injuries as a result of the wreck; she was declared deceased at the scene. The 20-year-old woman who had been behind the wheel of the pickup truck may have been injured, as well, reports state. Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

Sudden loss on the road often leaves behind confusion and uncertainty. In those moments, it’s easy to focus only on what’s immediately visible. But some of the most important answers are the ones that take time, effort, and a deeper look to uncover.

1. Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?
Any situation where a vehicle veers off the road, re-enters, and crosses into oncoming traffic should raise red flags about driver behavior, vehicle positioning, and timing. A full investigation should involve more than basic measurements and interviews. Did investigators document skid marks, vehicle rest positions, and damage patterns in detail? Was there an effort to reconstruct the sequence of events using mapping tools or modeling software? Some agencies have personnel trained in crash reconstruction, while others may rely on general patrol officers with limited resources. Whether the right tools were brought to bear here remains unclear.

2. Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
When a driver suddenly loses control after moving onto the shoulder, mechanical issues should be on the table. A stuck throttle, faulty brakes, or steering problems could all explain why the vehicle didn’t stabilize as expected. Without a comprehensive inspection by a qualified mechanic or engineer, these possibilities go unexamined. It’s especially important not to assume the driver’s age or experience tells the whole story—vehicles sometimes fail in ways that leave no obvious clues behind.

3. Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Both vehicles involved likely had electronic data recorders capable of revealing speed, braking, and steering activity in the moments leading up to impact. That kind of information is vital when evaluating whether the driver reacted appropriately or whether something went wrong inside the vehicle. On top of that, phone records, GPS data, and even footage from nearby cameras can provide added clarity. But gathering that information requires quick and deliberate action—was it taken here?

Looking closely at a crash means more than filing reports or assigning blame. It means making sure no piece of the story was left behind. Only when all the right questions get asked can anyone begin to understand what really happened.

Takeaways:

• A full crash investigation should include vehicle path analysis and expert review.
• Mechanical issues can cause a crash even when there are no obvious signs.
• Data from vehicle systems and phones can reveal critical facts—if someone gathers it.