Tyler, TX — December 22, 2025, one person was injured in a motorcycle accident just after 10 p.m. on East 5th Street/State Highway 64.

A preliminary accident report indicates that an eastbound 2025 Hyundai Santa Fe collided with a 2025 Kawasaki Ninja ZX while changing lanes near South Mahon Avenue.

Motorcyclist Kristopher Gomez, 24, suffered minor injuries in the crash, according to the report, while the 24-year-old woman riding with him was seriously injured.

The Hyundai driver, who was not hurt, was cited for making an unsafe lane change, the report states.

Authorities have not released any additional information about the Smith County crash at this time.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

After serious crashes, the first answers that surface are often the simplest ones. A citation gets written, a short report is filed and attention moves on. But when people are hurt, especially when injuries differ in severity, it’s worth slowing down and asking whether the early conclusions truly tell the whole story.

Did authorities conduct a thorough crash investigation? A basic report and a traffic citation don’t always reflect a deep investigation. The real question is whether investigators took time to reconstruct how the vehicles moved before contact, whether lane positions were verified and whether any physical evidence was carefully documented and preserved. Some officers are highly trained in complex crash analysis, while others may only have limited experience with crashes involving motorcycles and passengers. Without advanced reconstruction work, important details about timing, spacing and driver actions can be missed.

Has anyone looked into the possibility of a vehicle defect? When a vehicle changes lanes and a collision follows, it’s easy to assume the cause is obvious. But modern vehicles rely on steering, braking and electronic systems that don’t always fail in visible ways. A steering issue, brake problem or sensor malfunction could change how a vehicle responds in a critical moment. Both vehicles involved should be inspected closely to rule out mechanical or system-related problems that may not show up in a quick roadside review.

Has all available electronic data been collected? Today’s vehicles often store data that can confirm what actually happened seconds before a crash. Speed, braking, throttle input and steering angle may all be recorded. Phones, navigation systems and nearby cameras can also help clarify timing and attention. If this data isn’t preserved early, it can be lost forever, leaving only assumptions instead of facts.

Crashes like this raise questions that deserve more than surface-level answers. A deeper look can reveal whether early conclusions were accurate or whether key evidence was never considered. Asking these questions isn’t about assigning blame; it’s about understanding what truly happened and why that understanding matters.

Key takeaways:

• A citation alone doesn’t mean the crash was fully investigated.
• Mechanical or electronic issues can play a role even when nothing looks broken.
• Electronic data often provides answers that eyewitness accounts cannot.