Randall County, TX — July 7, 2024, Shawn Urton and one other person were injured in a car accident at approximately 6:45 p.m. along Canyon Drive.

According to authorities, 26-year-old Shawn Urton was traveling in a westbound Toyota Camry on Hollywood Road at the Canyon Drive intersection when the accident took place.

The intersection is controlled by a traffic signal. The Camry entered the intersection with a green light, according to reports. Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, a northbound Honda Accord occupied by a 16-year-old boy failed to stop for the red light. A collision consequently occurred between the front-left of the Camry and the front-right of the Accord.

Both Urton and the teen from the Accord reportedly sustained serious injuries over the course of the accident. EMS transported each of them to local medical facilities so that they could receive necessary treatment.

Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

Crashes in signal-controlled intersections often seem cut and dry—one driver runs the red, the other has the right of way. But when serious injuries are involved, that surface-level explanation isn’t enough. The right questions need to be asked to understand why a driver failed to stop and whether the evidence confirms the account as it's been told.

1. Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?

In any case involving conflicting movement through a signalized intersection, the integrity of the investigation hinges on more than just witness accounts. Did investigators confirm the signal timing and whether it matched the sequence described in reports? Was the crash site properly mapped, including the position of vehicles, skid marks, and debris fields? These details help confirm speeds, reactions, and points of impact—critical factors in determining not just who entered the intersection, but how much time they had to react. A green light on paper doesn’t mean much if the physical evidence hasn’t been fully documented.

2. Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?

If a teen driver failed to stop at a red light, the assumption is often distraction or inexperience—but mechanical issues are also worth examining. Was the Honda Accord’s braking system functioning properly? Could a stuck throttle, failed sensor, or delay in brake response have affected the outcome? These aren’t common problems, but they’re not unheard of either—and unless someone checks, they remain possible explanations. Even the Toyota should be reviewed to confirm whether any safety systems engaged as designed.

3. Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?

Today’s cars track a surprising amount of pre-crash information. Did investigators pull data from the Accord to confirm if the brakes were applied and when? Was there a sudden deceleration, or did the vehicle continue through the intersection without any sign of slowing? Similarly, the Camry’s data could verify its speed and any defensive action taken. Traffic cameras, if present, could provide visual confirmation. All of this evidence helps build a more complete picture—one that goes beyond assumptions and hearsay.

In crashes like this, the injuries are real and the questions are serious. Understanding why it happened, not just how, requires more than checking a box. It requires a full look at every possible factor.

Takeaways:

• Signal-controlled crashes must be verified with physical evidence and timing analysis.
• Mechanical failure in either vehicle could explain unexpected movements.
• Vehicle data and camera footage can confirm key details about speed and braking.