Gallatin, TX — July 3, 2025, a man was injured due to a single-car accident at approximately 5:00 a.m. along U.S. Highway 69.

According to authorities, a 41-year-old man was traveling in a northwest bound Dodge Dakota pickup truck on U.S. 69 in the vicinity southeast of the County Road 1608 intersection when the accident took place.

Officials indicate that, allegedly in an attempted to avoid a passing vehicle, the pickup truck swerved and consequently failed to maintain its lane of travel. It was subsequently involved in a single-vehicle collision in which it apparently struck a tree. The man reportedly sustained serious injuries over the course of the accident. Additional details pertaining to this incident—including the identity of the victim—are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

When a driver swerves to avoid another vehicle and ends up in a serious crash, it’s tempting to stop at the surface explanation: “he overcorrected.” But when the outcome is a truck into a tree, the real concern is whether investigators looked deeper into why the pickup couldn’t stay under control.

1. Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?
A claim that the Dodge Dakota swerved to avoid another vehicle should be supported by evidence. Did investigators look for witness statements, tire marks, or other clues confirming another car was present? Was the truck’s path mapped to determine whether it was a gradual drift or a sudden maneuver? Without that work, the explanation risks being chalked up to driver error without proof.

2. Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
Even if another vehicle played a role, the Dakota itself deserves scrutiny. A steering problem, suspension failure, or tire blowout could make the truck far harder to control during a swerve. Older pickups, in particular, may not have stability systems that help prevent rollovers or lane departures. Unless the truck was thoroughly inspected, there’s no way to know whether mechanical failure turned a close call into a serious collision.

3. Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Modern vehicles often record speed, steering, braking, and throttle data leading up to impact. If that data was retrieved, it could show whether the driver tried to brake or correct before hitting the tree. Phone records may also reveal if distraction played a role, while cameras or GPS could confirm whether another vehicle was nearby. Without that information, investigators are left with only partial answers.

Swerving to avoid another driver may explain the first movement, but it doesn’t explain why the crash became unavoidable. That’s the difference between a surface report and a full investigation.

Key Takeaways:

• Claims of swerving to avoid another vehicle should be backed by physical or digital evidence.
• Mechanical failures—like tire, suspension, or steering issues—could have made the truck uncontrollable.
• Black box, phone, and camera data are essential for confirming the sequence of events.