Princeton, TX — August 4, 2025, a pedestrian was killed in a car accident at about 12:30 a.m. in the 500 block of South 2nd Street/F.M. 982.

A preliminary accident report indicates that a 2007 Toyota Camry was heading north near Wood Street when it hit a pedestrian.

The pedestrian, a 61-year-old man, died from injuries suffered in the crash, according to the report. His name has not been made public yet.

The Toyota driver, who was not hurt, is not facing any charges or citations related to the crash at this time, the report states.

Authorities have not released any additional information about the Collin County crash.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

When accidents happen late at night, especially those involving someone on foot, it’s natural to wonder how such tragedies unfold and whether anything might have prevented them. In the quiet hours, when visibility drops and streets grow still, what’s often missing isn’t just light. It’s clear, thorough answers.

Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? The early reports don’t tell us much, and that raises a flag. When a pedestrian is struck and killed, especially during nighttime hours, investigators need to dig deep. That means not just taking a few measurements and moving on, but carefully mapping the scene, reconstructing how both parties moved in the moments before impact and checking for any possible distraction or impairment on the driver’s part. It also matters whether investigators interviewed any potential witnesses, reviewed dashcam footage or used scene analysis tools to get a full picture. In smaller towns or overnight incidents, it’s not uncommon for these steps to be rushed or skipped entirely.

Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash? A 2007 Toyota Camry is no stranger to recalls and wear-and-tear issues. If something failed in the vehicle — like the braking system, steering components or even a headlight — that could have played a role, especially in low-light conditions. But unless someone takes the time to inspect that car beyond the surface level, those mechanical details may never come to light. Just because the car looks fine after a crash doesn’t mean it was working right before it.

Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected? Modern cars, even older models like that Camry, often carry data that tells a story: whether the driver braked, how fast they were going, if any sudden moves were made. There’s also the possibility of nearby security cameras, traffic cams or phone data that could paint a fuller picture. If none of that’s been reviewed, the investigation is relying heavily on just one side of the story.

When a life is lost on a quiet Texas street, the questions shouldn’t stop at what’s easy to see. Real accountability means digging deeper, looking harder and not settling for surface-level answers.

Key Takeaways:

• Just because no charges were filed doesn’t mean the investigation is complete.
• Mechanical problems don’t always leave obvious clues. Inspections matter.
• Phone records and car data can confirm what really happened before impact.