Fayette County, TX — July 13, 2025, Danny Moore and Sandra Virga-Moore were killed and April Poissant was injured in a car accident at about 9:15 p.m. on Interstate 10.

A preliminary accident report indicates that a 2023 GMC Sierra was heading west near Schulenburg when it crashed into a 2008 Honda CR-V as traffic was slowing because of an earlier accident. a 2015 Toyota RAV4 and a 2025 Toyota Tundra also were damaged in the crash.

Honda driver Danny Moore, 75, and wife Sandra Virga-Moore, 73, of Seguin died in the crash, according to the report.

RAV4 driver April Poissant, 51, of Kerrville was seriously injured in the crash, the report states.

The other drivers were not hurt, according to the report.

Authorities have not released any additional information about the Fayette County crash at this time.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

After serious traffic collisions, there’s a natural urge to find clarity in the chaos, something that explains how ordinary moments can turn so suddenly tragic. But often, the answers don’t come easily. Uncovering the full story takes more than a quick report. It takes asking the right questions from the start.

Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? In any multi-vehicle collision, especially one unfolding after traffic has already slowed for a previous incident, it's critical that investigators dig deeper than just noting vehicle positions. Were detailed measurements taken to reconstruct the timing and sequence of impacts? Did anyone assess how far back the GMC Sierra’s driver could have seen the slowdown? And perhaps most importantly, were investigators equipped with the right tools and training to analyze the scene thoroughly, especially at night when visibility can complicate observations? Too often, the complexity of a chain-reaction crash is reduced to a simple rear-end narrative without fully exploring the dynamics at play.

Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash? A late-model truck like the GMC Sierra typically comes with numerous driver-assist features, including forward collision alerts, automatic emergency braking and other systems designed to reduce rear-end impacts. The key question is whether those systems were working correctly. If they didn’t engage, why not? Mechanical inspections aren't just a formality. They're a necessary step to rule out issues like brake failure or malfunctioning sensors. Without that, it's impossible to know whether this crash was purely driver-related or if the machine failed in a critical moment.

Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected? With multiple modern vehicles involved, there’s likely a treasure trove of digital evidence: from onboard computers logging speed, throttle input and braking, to GPS data and even nearby traffic cameras. In particular, the GMC's engine control module could reveal how the driver responded (or didn’t) in the moments leading up to the crash. Likewise, checking phone activity or infotainment logs could show whether distraction played a role. But gathering this kind of evidence takes time and initiative, neither of which should be overlooked when lives are lost.

Crashes like this don’t just raise questions. They demand accountability. And that starts with making sure no part of the story gets missed or rushed. It's not about blame; it’s about understanding what really happened, and making sure it doesn’t happen again.

Key Takeaways:

• A thorough crash investigation goes beyond surface details. Complex collisions require deeper analysis.
• Vehicle systems can fail, even in newer models; only mechanical inspections can confirm or rule that out.
• Electronic data often holds the clearest record of a crash, if it's collected before it's lost.