Cooke County, TX — December 31, 2025, Nicholas Zumbro was killed due to a pedestrian versus car accident along U.S. Highway 82.

According to authorities, 36-year-old Nicholas Zumbro was on foot walking on U.S. 82 in the vicinity east of Weaver Street when the accident took place.

Officials indicate that, for as yet unknown reasons, Zumbro was hit by an SUV. He reportedly suffered critical injuries due to the collision; he was transported to a local medical facility by EMS in order to receive immediate treatment. However, he was ultimately unable to overcome the severity of his injuries, having there been declared deceased.

Additional details pertaining to this incident are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

When a pedestrian is struck and killed on a highway, it’s easy for the conversation to stop at why the person was on foot in the first place. But that’s rarely the whole story. A fatal incident like this demands a closer look at every contributing factor—because the outcome might not have been inevitable.

1. Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?
To understand what happened, investigators should have mapped the exact point of impact, assessed where the pedestrian was walking relative to the roadway, and evaluated whether the driver had adequate time and space to react. Highways like U.S. 82 pose significant risks to pedestrians, but that doesn’t excuse a lack of detailed analysis. If basic scene measurements or driver statements were all that was collected, critical pieces of the puzzle may be missing.

2. Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
In any crash where a driver fails to avoid a pedestrian, the possibility of a mechanical or system failure should be considered. Was there a headlight malfunction? Did the SUV have pedestrian detection or emergency braking technology that failed to activate? If the vehicle wasn’t inspected after the crash, these questions might never get answered—and any systemic problems could go unnoticed.

3. Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Modern vehicles can record a surprising amount of pre-crash information: speed, steering, throttle, braking, and system warnings. That data can show whether the driver reacted or whether the vehicle failed to help avoid the crash. Investigators should also review phone records, GPS, and any available traffic or surveillance camera footage. In nighttime or low-visibility conditions, these digital sources may offer the clearest understanding of what happened.

A pedestrian’s presence on a highway may complicate the situation, but it doesn’t remove the need for a full investigation. Accountability starts with asking the right questions—especially when the answers aren’t obvious.

Takeaways:

• Fatal pedestrian crashes require full scene documentation and vehicle trajectory analysis.
• A defect in lighting or collision avoidance systems could have prevented the driver from responding.
• Electronic data and camera footage may be the best way to understand what occurred.