Dallas County, TX — November 30, 2025, a man was injured in a pedestrian versus hit-and-run car accident at approximately 2:30 a.m. along North Bishop Avenue.

According to authorities, a 23-year-old man was on foot at the North Bishop Avenue and Melba Street intersection when the accident took place.

Officials indicate that a northbound vehicle of unknown make or model apparently made an improper start from a parked position and struck the pedestrian. The vehicle then allegedly fled the scene, the person(s) inside failing to stop and render aid of any sort to the victim.

The man reportedly sustained serious injuries as a result of the accident. Additional details pertaining to this incident—including the identity of the victim—are not available at this point in time. The investigation is currently ongoing.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

When a pedestrian is seriously hurt by a vehicle that flees the scene, it’s clear that something went wrong. But when the vehicle allegedly started from a parked position before the crash, that raises even more pressing questions. Understanding how this happened—and whether it could have been avoided—means digging beyond just who ran.

Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash?
Hit-and-runs always leave gaps, but it’s the job of the investigation to close them. Did officers canvass nearby buildings or street-facing cameras for footage? Were any tire marks, debris, or signs of abrupt movement documented? A vehicle moving from a parked position should never surprise a pedestrian—unless that move was sudden, aggressive, or done without looking. Reconstructing the vehicle’s movement and timing, even after it’s gone, is key to understanding what went wrong.

Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash?
If the driver didn’t intend to accelerate—or couldn’t stop in time—it’s possible the vehicle contributed to the incident. Could a stuck throttle, brake failure, or electronic parking system glitch have played a role? These systems, particularly in newer cars, can malfunction in ways that catch drivers off guard. If the vehicle is ever recovered, a detailed mechanical and electronic inspection should be done—not just to confirm what happened, but to ensure it doesn’t happen again.

Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected?
Assuming the hit-and-run vehicle is found, onboard data could prove crucial. Was the vehicle accelerating hard? Did the brakes engage? Was there any warning system activity? This information could verify whether the driver was distracted, reckless, or reacting to a vehicle issue. Even before the vehicle is located, local traffic or security cameras might hold enough footage to identify make, model, or license plate. But as always, that evidence won’t last forever—it needs to be preserved early.

In cases like this, it’s not just about who ran. It’s also about whether the crash could have been avoided—and whether the victim had any real chance to get out of the way.

Takeaways:

• Hit-and-run pedestrian crashes involving parked vehicles require detailed reconstruction of vehicle movement and driver behavior.
• Mechanical or electronic failures—such as unintended acceleration—must be ruled out if the vehicle is found.
• Traffic cameras, vehicle data, and early scene evidence can help fill in gaps that the fleeing driver left behind.