Kent County, TX — January 3, 2026, a teen was killed in an ATV accident at about noon on County Road 438 south of Jayton.

Authorities said a Polaris Ranger Crew ATV was heading east when it overturned on a curve near State Highway 70.

A 15-year-old Tahoka boy died from injuries suffered in the crash, according to authorities.

The 14-year-old New Home girl driving the ATV and a 7-year-old passenger were not injured, authorities said.

Authorities have not released any additional information about the Kent County crash at this time.

Commentary by Attorney Michael Grossman

When serious incidents happen involving young people and off-road vehicles, the circumstances often deserve closer attention. ATVs are widely used in rural areas, but that doesn't mean investigations into their crashes should be any less thorough. These vehicles operate differently from standard passenger cars, and when something goes wrong, there’s a lot that needs to be examined.

Did the authorities thoroughly investigate the crash? At this point, it’s unclear whether investigators conducted a detailed reconstruction of the ATV’s path or the events leading up to the rollover. With multiple people on board and only one sustaining fatal injuries, understanding the vehicle’s movements through the curve is essential. In many rural jurisdictions, available resources and training levels can vary, which may affect how deeply a crash is analyzed. Without tools like 3D mapping or a mechanical workup, key factors — such as speed, angle of approach and driver inputs — can be overlooked.

Has anyone looked into the possibility that a vehicle defect caused the crash? The Polaris Ranger Crew is a utility vehicle with a known history of mechanical recalls. While there’s no suggestion of a defect here, that possibility shouldn’t be dismissed without a full inspection. Braking systems, steering components and tire conditions all play a role in how these vehicles handle turns. A sudden malfunction, particularly with three passengers onboard, could easily affect stability. Unless someone inspects the machine post-crash, there’s no way to confirm that every system was functioning as it should.

Has all the electronic data relating to the crash been collected? Newer ATVs may contain limited onboard data, but additional information could still exist. Cell phone location records, app data or even nearby camera footage, if any exists, might help clarify the sequence of events. This is especially important when initial reports leave gaps or raise questions. Verifying speed, direction and timing through digital evidence adds another layer to the analysis that shouldn’t be skipped.

When off-road vehicles are involved in serious crashes, thorough follow-up is just as important as it is in highway collisions. Asking more detailed questions helps prevent premature conclusions and ensures all angles are considered.

Key Takeaways:

• It’s unclear if the crash scene was analyzed using full reconstruction tools.
• The ATV should be inspected for potential mechanical problems.
• Digital data from phones or other sources might clarify the timeline.